Table 5. Path analysis (p<.05)

Latent variables			Estimate	Standard error	C.R.	p-value
Inefficiency	→	Inconvenience	.413	.063	6.522	***
Inefficiency	→	Work environment	.231	.078	2.968	.003
inefficiency	→	Safety feedback	-.203	.054	-3.753	***
Work environment	→	Safety feedback	-.018	.038	-.481	.631
Inconvenience	→	Safety feedback	-.025	.061	-.416	.678
Inefficiency	→	Safety philosophy	.148	.052	2.857	.004
Safety feedback	→	Safety philosophy	.661	.097	6.776	***
Work environment	→	Safety philosophy	-.069	.035	-1.949	.051
Inconvenience	→	Safety philosophy	-.112	.057	-1.971	.049
Safety feedback	→	Job satisfaction	.271	.116	2.331	.020
Safety philosophy	→	Job satisfaction	.374	.116	3.223	.001
Inconvenience	→	Job satisfaction	-.136	.061	-2.236	.025
Work environment	→	Organizational trust	-.101	.039	-2.608	.009
Job satisfaction	→	Organizational trust	.398	.069	5.772	***
Safety feedback	→	Organizational trust	.583	.097	6.020	***

CMIN/df=2.255, RMR=.049, GFI=.864, AGFI=.825, NFI=.880, IFI=.930, TLI=.916, CFI=.929, RMSEA=.069