Table 3. Path planning results at 1000, 1500, 2000 and 2500 iterations for 2-D case 1, 2, 3 & 3000, 3500, 4000, and 4500 iterations for 2-D case 4
| 환경 | 알고리즘 | Biasing Ratio | Biasing Radius | 평균 비용 (n=1000) | 평균 비용 (n=1500) | 평균 비용 (n=2000) | 평균 비용 (n=2500) | 최적 비용 |
| 2-D Case1 | RRT* | × | 89.94 | 86.75 | 86.7 | 86.36 | 83.03 |
| RRT*-Smart | 2 | 3 | 85.35 | 84.30 | 84.27 | 84.27 |
| mRRT*-Smart | 84.12 | 83.99 | 83.95 | 83.95 |
| 2-D Case2 | RRT* | × | 135.8 | 123.9 | 122.5 | 122.4 | 117.2 |
| RRT*-Smart | 2 | 3 | 130.2 | 123.8 | 121.6 | 119.8 |
| mRRT*-Smart | 129.5 | 124.3 | 120.9 | 118.2 |
| 2-D Case3 | RRT* | × | 100.0 | 97.8 | 96.6 | 94.2 | 84.9 |
| RRT*-Smart | 2 | 3 | 99.8 | 95.8 | 92.7 | 91.9 |
| mRRT*-Smart | 99.7 | 92.4 | 88.4 | 86.6 |
| 2-D Case4 | RRT* | × | 143.9 | 132.5 | 130.1 | 128.7 | 118.8 |
| RRT*-Smart | 2 | 3 | 136.4 | 129.5 | 128.9 | 123.2 |
| mRRT*-Smart | 135.9 | 124.3 | 121.9 | 120.8 |